{"id":1331,"date":"2026-06-02T16:59:10","date_gmt":"2026-06-02T16:59:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/silvybrand.com\/?p=1331"},"modified":"2026-06-02T16:59:10","modified_gmt":"2026-06-02T16:59:10","slug":"trump-green-cards-adjustment-of-status-uscis","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/silvybrand.com\/?p=1331","title":{"rendered":"DHS walked back its new adjustment of status policy, but confusion remains"},"content":{"rendered":"


\n<\/p>\n

\n
\n

On the Friday before Memorial Day, on the eve of a long weekend, the Trump administration announced that it was further gutting legal immigration. The Department of Homeland Security didn\u2019t use this language. \u201cThis policy allows our immigration system to function as the law intended instead of incentivizing loopholes,\u201d the agency said on X<\/a>. \u201cThe era of abusing our nation\u2019s immigration system is over.\u201d A press release from US Citizenship and Immigration Services, the agency that handles legal immigration, provided few details. Following the Trump playbook, DHS seemingly intended to bury this news by announcing it at a time that hardly anyone would be paying attention.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

In actuality, the change represented a major policy shift, ending the decades-old standard of letting people apply for green cards from inside the US, known as \u201cadjustment of status.\u201d And then a week later, on yet another Friday afternoon, DHS walked it back<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The confusion over DHS\u2019s changes to adjustment of status \u2014 as well as the policy itself \u2014 are emblematic of the Trump administration\u2019s stance toward legal immigration. DHS initially framed the shift as a straightforward fix to a broken system. But immigration lawyers said the move would be devastating for legal immigrants, upending the lives of hundreds of thousands of people each year, and potentially separating them from jobs and families for years \u2014 or indefinitely. The situation has been all the more chaotic due to a lack of clarity, yet another Trump administration hallmark.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

US Citizenship and Immigration Services announced the change in a May 21 memo<\/a>. As written, the document implies that most people who live in the US and want to apply for green cards \u2014 say, someone on an H-1B visa who is pursuing permanent residency \u2014 will have to leave the country to do so. But there appear to be some carve-outs. In a statement to CBS News<\/em><\/a>, USCIS spokesperson Zach Kahler said immigrants whose applications \u201cprovide an economic benefit or otherwise are in the national interest will likely be able to continue on their current path.\u201d The memo itself, however, leaves that unclear.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\u201cIt\u2019s kind of hinted that H-1Bs, it probably won\u2019t apply to, but we don\u2019t know that for sure,\u201d said Todd Schulte, the president of FWD.us, an immigration reform organization founded by Mark Zuckerberg and other tech executives<\/a> in 2013. \u201cI think it\u2019s fair to say that\u2019s an open question.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The trickle of information related to the policy change \u2014 which, if implemented as written, would affect more than half a million people a year \u2014 is contributing to a sense of chaos and uncertainty for prospective green card applicants, including those on H-1B visas. H-1B workers constitute a major chunk of the tech workforce<\/a>. During the last fiscal year, tech companies made up seven of the 10 biggest sponsors of H-1B visas. Amazon led the pack, with 12,391 H-1B approvals in the 2026 fiscal year alone.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

There are two ways to apply for a green card. The first is through consular processing, which happens at US consulates in other countries. People who apply this way are issued immigrant visas that let them come over to the US, where they then apply for permanent residency. Because the US has an annual cap on immigrant visas per country, this can be a prolonged process for applicants from countries that send a lot of immigrants to the US. For example, a Mexican national applying for a family-based immigrant visa because their sibling is a US citizen can expect to wait 25 years<\/a>, while a Filipino applying for the same reason would wait about 19 years. The second way to apply for a green card is through adjustment of status \u2014 which, unlike consular processing, doesn\u2019t count against the per-country quotas for immigrant visas. Codified under the 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act, adjustment of status lets people already living in the US apply for permanent residency without leaving the country. More than 600,000 people applied for adjustment of status during the 2023 fiscal year.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The USCIS memo seeks to eliminate this latter path to citizenship as much as possible, reserving it for \u201cextraordinary circumstances.\u201d In practice, this could mean that hundreds of thousands of people will have to leave the country each year just to apply for permanent residency. Because of the Trump administration\u2019s other restrictions on legal immigration<\/a>, including a moratorium on visas issued to nationals of 75 countries, that could mean that people who leave the country to apply for green cards will be stranded abroad. And for undocumented immigrants who marry US citizens, leaving the country to apply for permanent residency could in fact lead to them being prohibited from returning to the US for as long as a decade, due to bars legal on reentry<\/a> for people with certain immigration violations.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

That is, of course, assuming the policy is actually implemented as written, which DHS now claims it won\u2019t be. In a statement issued to The New York Times<\/em> last Friday, DHS said the change wouldn\u2019t apply to all applicants. \u201cThis was just a reminder to officers of their discretionary authority, which has always existed on a case-by-case basis,\u201d a spokesperson, who declined to be named, told the Times<\/em>. A senior White House official told the Times<\/em> that the change was a housekeeping matter, not a policy change. But these clarifications are coming through the media, not through follow-up memos, adding to the confusion. And before the backlash came, DHS reposted<\/a> a Wall Street Journal <\/em>writeup of the announcement that said \u201cmost\u201d green-card applicants would have to leave the country, calling the policy \u201ccommonsense.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Immigration lawyers have already seen changes on the ground. In a May 28th press call, Jeff Joseph, president of the American Immigration Lawyers Association, said the policy was implemented a day before the formal announcement. According to Joseph, USCIS adjudicators are now asking people applying for adjustment of status why they applied for adjustment of status instead of consular processing, whether there are any factors that would prevent them from consular processing, whether they still have family connections living in their home country, and why they decided not to return to their country when their period of stay expired.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

This line of questioning, Joseph said, puts applicants in a defensive position. \u201cThere\u2019s this assumption that you\u2019re doing something wrong if you overstay [your visa] and apply for adjustment of status,\u201d Joseph said. But applicants for adjustment of status are often eligible for a \u201cperiod of stay\u201d that allows them to remain in the country without accruing unlawful status \u2014 that is, without becoming immediately deportable \u2014 while their case is processed. But this change, which Joseph called \u201cunprecedented,\u201d could cause people to choose between falling out of legal status or leaving the country entirely.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\u201cThe Trump administration has been saying since the beginning that there are targets for arrests of undocumented individuals, and the only way they get there is to go after legal immigration,\u201d Joseph said. \u201cThey don\u2019t get to the numbers that they need if they\u2019re only going after criminals.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Uncertainty about how the policy will be implemented and who it applies to is leading to unease for prospective applicants \u2014 which may be the point.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\u201cIt has created a lot of concern and anxiety among individuals, among families, among companies, among employees, which may be part of the strategy in general,\u201d Xiao Wang, the cofounder and CEO of Boundless Immigration, a company that helps immigrants apply for green cards, told The Verge<\/em>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Wang said the confusion around adjustment of status is indicative of the administration\u2019s chaotic approach to immigration policy. \u201cThere\u2019s both a clear sort of general direction this administration wants to take with immigration,\u201d Wang said, and a habit of throwing things at the wall and seeing what sticks. \u201cIt\u2019s almost like a startup [minimum viable product] way of testing the waters around new policies.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Wang pointed to the rollout of the $100,000 fee hike for H-1B visas<\/a> as a comparable example. Like the green card change, the H-1B fee increase was announced on a Friday. \u201cFor a few days [after the announcement], every company frantically tried to fly everyone back home<\/a> into the US before Monday morning,\u201d Wang said, \u201cand the government had to issue a number of clarifications over the weekend.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

After some backlash, the administration clarified that the H-1B fee increase would only apply to new applications, not to those already in the US.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Still, critics say the patchwork of changes to immigrant processing \u2014 even when they\u2019re walked back \u2014 are part of a broader effort to keep immigrants out for good.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\u201cThere\u2019s a lot of people who want to call it as it is, which is incredibly harmful and bad and scary, and at the highest levels, deeply, deeply detrimental to the US,\u201d said Schulte. \u201cThey, through bureaucratic double-speak, are trying to hide the ball from what they\u2019re doing.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Follow topics and authors<\/strong> from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.<\/span><\/p>\n