{"id":3624,"date":"2026-07-12T12:30:15","date_gmt":"2026-07-12T12:30:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/silvybrand.com\/?p=3624"},"modified":"2026-07-12T12:30:15","modified_gmt":"2026-07-12T12:30:15","slug":"ai-data-centers-fight","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/silvybrand.com\/?p=3624","title":{"rendered":"The fight against AI data centers is just beginning"},"content":{"rendered":"


\n<\/p>\n

\n
\n

This is <\/em>The Stepback<\/a>, a weekly newsletter breaking down one essential story from the tech world. For more on the data center buildout, follow Emma Roth<\/a>. <\/em>The Stepback arrives in our subscribers\u2019 inboxes on Sunday at 8AM ET. Opt in for <\/em>The Stepback here<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Years before the AI boom threatened local power grids, a small group of protesters set the stage for the battles cropping up across communities today. In 2015, Apple announced plans<\/a> to build a roughly $1 billion<\/a> data center in the sleepy town of Athenry, Ireland. The data center\u2019s 500-acre site would power Apple\u2019s services in Europe, including iTunes, iMessage, and Siri. At the time, Apple said the data center would offer outdoor education spaces, walking trails, and an initiative to replant native trees. It would also use 100 percent renewable energy. With the approval from the local government and plans to give back to the community, Apple likely didn\u2019t anticipate the lengthy battle it was about to face.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Apple\u2019s building plans were quickly derailed after Irish residents lodged complaints<\/a> to the country\u2019s independent planning board about the expected noise, light pollution, flooding, traffic, and impact on local wildlife. While the board ultimately approved Apple\u2019s facility in 2016<\/a>, the fight didn\u2019t end there, as residents applied for judicial review of the board\u2019s decision in the Irish High Court. In 2017, the Irish High Court ruled in favor<\/a> of Apple, but the pair of activists behind the appeal wanted to bring the decision<\/a> before Ireland\u2019s Supreme Court \u2014 and that was finally enough for Apple to call it quits. Even with the support of some of Athenry\u2019s residents<\/a>, Apple gave up just months later, in May 2018<\/a>, after its building plans remained in limbo for years.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Over the past decades, data centers for cloud storage and other non-AI-related purposes have become ubiquitous. But data centers are coming under increasing scrutiny in 2026, with sprawling AI data centers consuming as much energy as entire states<\/a> and some as large as cities<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

More people are recognizing the risks AI data centers pose to their communities as residents living near these facilities report rising energy costs<\/a>, issues affecting local water quality<\/a>, and noise <\/a>and light pollution, along with concerns about greenhouse gas emission<\/a>s. The US Energy Information Administration said commercial energy demand would surpass residential demand<\/a> for the first time this year due to the AI data center buildout. That demand is expected to double by 2027<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Now, many people are rushing to block the buildout of AI data centers in their communities, with residents<\/a> flooding<\/a> town<\/a> halls<\/a> across<\/a> the nation<\/a> to voice<\/a> their concerns about the buildout. From January to March alone, protesters have blocked or delayed at least 75 projects in the US valued at $130 billion, according to a study from Data Center Watch<\/a>, a research project backed by the AI security company 10a Labs. \u201cThe number of active opposition groups more than doubled from 396 at the end of 2025 to 833 by the end of Q1 2026, now spanning 49 states,\u201d the study says. \u201cOver 235,000 petition signatures were collected in this quarter alone.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

In January, the Blackstone-owned data center company QTS dropped plans<\/a> to build a $12 billion<\/a> campus in DeForest, Wisconsin, following protests<\/a> from community members. Meanwhile, a planned data center on a 580-acre campus in Delaware City is facing roadblocks, as local regulators determined<\/a> in March that the planned facility is prohibited under the state\u2019s Coastal Zone Act, which blocks heavy industry on its shorelines. And so far in July, opponents successfully blocked a QTS data center<\/a> in Prince William County, Virginia. The \u201cDigital Gateway\u201d would\u2019ve spanned 2,000 acres in a state that\u2019s already dealing with rising energy costs<\/a> from data center buildout. Residents also pressured Shark Tank<\/em> star Kevin O\u2019Leary to downsize<\/a> his proposed 40,000-acre Project Stratos campus<\/a> in Box Elder County, Utah.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

With new data center proposals emerging<\/a> what seems like each week, the fight is far from over.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

As protests in communities across the US and beyond play out, a political battle is breaking out in Congress. Data centers are a key part of President Donald Trump\u2019s plan to win the AI race against China, which is why he signed an executive order last year<\/a> to fast-track the construction of the sprawling facilities. But not everyone on Capitol Hill is on board with Trump\u2019s stance on AI data centers.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

With midterm elections around the corner, some Republican candidates are distancing<\/a> themselves from Trump\u2019s data center-friendly views to curry favor with residents. Sen. Bernie Sanders (D-VT) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) introduced a bill<\/a> that would pause the construction of new AI data centers until Congress passes laws that would prevent the facilities from raising utility prices or harming the environment. At the same time, lawmakers from both sides of the political aisle are backing the Ratepayer Protection Act<\/a>, a set of laws that codifies an agreement<\/a> signed by Google, Meta, Microsoft, and other tech giants to pay for their own data center energy costs. Other lawmakers stand behind the Guaranteeing Rate Insulation from Data Centers (GRID) Act<\/a>, which would force data centers to use energy sources separate from the US electric grid in an effort to protect residents from utility bill increases.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Local governments are taking steps to regulate AI data centers, too. Tech Policy Press<\/em> reports that both Democrat- and Republican-led states<\/a> have enacted 28 laws related to AI data centers, including Florida, which introduced rules to prevent data centers<\/a> from passing on costs to residents. Idaho put restrictions<\/a> on AI data center water usage, while Washington state removed a tax break<\/a> for the companies operating the facilities.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The current patchwork of local laws isn\u2019t enough to rein in the buildout, and the federal-level bills still have to make their way through Congress, leaving many communities to fend for themselves. Just two people were enough to tie up Apple\u2019s plans in Ireland, and now it\u2019s taking entire towns and cities to fight against the massive data centers coming to their neighborhoods, like Meta\u2019s $27 billion \u201cHyperion\u201d build<\/a> in Louisiana, Google\u2019s $10 billion Project Mica<\/a> in Missouri, SpaceXAI\u2019s $20 billion campus<\/a> in Mississippi, and the $500 billion Stargate data centers<\/a> planned across the US.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n