{"id":4281,"date":"2026-07-23T17:11:46","date_gmt":"2026-07-23T17:11:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/silvybrand.com\/?p=4281"},"modified":"2026-07-23T17:11:46","modified_gmt":"2026-07-23T17:11:46","slug":"tesla-robotaxi-mileage-waymo-cities-earnings-musk","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/silvybrand.com\/?p=4281","title":{"rendered":"Tesla\u2019s robotaxi promises are clashing with reality"},"content":{"rendered":"


\n<\/p>\n

\n
\n

In an earnings call yesterday<\/a>, Tesla CEO Elon Musk did his best to paint a positive portrait of the company\u2019s robotaxi program. New cities are being added, more miles are being driven, and more people are experiencing Tesla\u2019s unsupervised vehicles.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

But Musk\u2019s typical bullishness seemed to be absent from the call, as the occasional trillionaire sought to temper expectations about the program\u2019s future.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\u201cWe\u2019re going as fast as humanly possible in scaling Robotaxi,\u201d Musk said, \u201cwhile trying to ensure that we do not harm anyone at all and ideally do not even run over a pet.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Musk\u2019s insistence that Tesla\u2019s robotaxi service was growing is clashing with the reality of the situation: Mileage is basically flat<\/a>, the number of vehicles appears to be shrinking, and despite the Tesla executive team\u2019s claims of \u201czero notable incidents,\u201d the safety of the company\u2019s technology appears to be an open question.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Tesla did it\u2019s best to frame the situation as headed in the right direction. Ashok Elluswamy, the company\u2019s head of AI, said that Tesla\u2019s unsupervised robotaxis have driven 380,000 miles across six cities in two different states. And according to Musk, that was increasing at a rate of 10 percent a week in terms of miles driven.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Tesla did it\u2019s best to frame the situation as headed in the right direction<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Elluswamy couldn\u2019t help but take a swipe at Tesla\u2019s competitors who use lidar sensors, as opposed to Tesla\u2019s camera-0nly approach. \u201cHistorically, the so-called experts have always claimed that you need lidars, radars, HD maps, and the entire kitchen sink to drive safely,\u201d he said. \u201cHere we show that such is not true. You can have safe, comfortable, and affordable autonomy with just cameras. This record should be a huge validation of Tesla\u2019s entire AI approach.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

But even the numbers that Tesla reported seem to betray that message. Waymo, which uses lidar sensors and radar as redundant sensors in addition to cameras, typically drives around four million miles a week. Tesla\u2019s total mileage, a year into its robotaxi program, is less than 10 percent of that figure. This reality is starting to spook investors, with BNP Paribas Equity Research senior analyst James Picariello calling it \u201can alarming decline\u201d in a research note to clients.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Tesla uses a mix of unsupervised and supervised vehicles as part of its fleet, but that ratio appears to be in a constant state of flux. According to the crowdsourced Robotaxi Tracker<\/a>, the company currently only has 16 unsupervised vehicles in Austin, four in Dallas, and one in Houston. During the earnings call, Elluswamy was asked what was preventing Tesla from flooding the zone in Austin, where it first launched its robotaxis a year ago, as opposed to dropping a small number of vehicles in new cities.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\u201cThe reason we have been expanding across different cities, instead of just doubling down on a single city, is that we want to make sure that our stack is a very general one,\u201d Elluswamy said. \u201cIt is a general one. We just want to like, you know, both prove to ourselves and to other folks that it is working across a lot of different cities without too much effort per city.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Another limiting factor is state regulations. New Jersey is considering a bill<\/a> that would essentially ban robotaxis without multiple sensors, like radar and lidar. Morgan Stanley analyst Andrew Percoco flagged this on the call, noting \u201cthere seems to be some evolving regulations at the state level, potentially around sensor requirements.\u201d To which Tesla\u2019s vice president of vehicle engineering Lars Morvay acknowledged \u201cobviously the stuff in New Jersey, you know, is a little bit disheartening.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

A more restrictive regulatory environment could limit the total addressable market for Tesla robotaxis, which would clash with the company\u2019s message about a more generalized service that can drive anywhere, under any conditions.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Safety is another obstacle. Musk\u2019s comment about wanting to avoid running over anyone\u2019s pet appeared to be a subtle swipe at Waymo, which has hit and killed a number of animals over the past several years. But Tesla\u2019s safety record is a mixed bag. We don\u2019t have a lot of great insight into Tesla\u2019s robotaxi crashes because the company tends to redact a lot of the important details.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

According to the Robotaxi Tracker, the company\u2019s fleet has been involved in approximately 18 incidents, 56 percent of which were the fault of another driver. And Tesla\u2019s Full Self-Driving is under investigation by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, with the potential for a future recall. Tesla\u2019s robotaxis are currently running version 15 of FSD, as compared to version 14.3.6 on its customer vehicles.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Tesla is asking investors, supporters, and customers to look past these shortcomings as it continues to push the message that it\u2019s robotaxi program is growing. But the company continues to run into a reality that contradicts that message.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Follow topics and authors<\/strong> from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.<\/span><\/p>\n