If there\u2019s one issue that seems to activate all kinds of voters in 2026, it\u2019s data centers. The rapid buildout of these massive server storage facilities \u2014 and the infrastructure construction and expenses that come with them \u2014 has sparked local opposition in communities across the country and become a major issue in many congressional and gubernatorial campaigns.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
At the same time, tech money has been pouring into many of these races. Leading the Future, a super PAC backed by venture capitalist Marc Andreessen and OpenAI President Greg Brockman, has already spent $45 million in a year. And Public First Action, an Anthropic-backed group<\/a> that says it supports AI safeguards, says it\u2019s raised $80 million<\/a>. Both have funded Democratic and Republican-aligned groups. Other super PACs see an opportunity to push for stricter AI policies<\/a>, like the recently created Tomorrow Together, which launched $4 million in ads for battleground House races, with messages about data center development<\/a> and AI safety<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n All sorts of candidates appear to be distancing themselves from data centers and taking steps to assuage voters\u2019 concerns about unconstrained buildouts in their backyards. How far they\u2019re willing to go \u2014 including by backing an outright moratorium on development \u2014 varies. While many Democratic candidates seem likelier to back a pause, that\u2019s not always the case. And though some Republicans have leaned on party messaging about putting development in local control, rather than supporting a ban, others say a pause is exactly what the moment calls for.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Deep red Texas has the second-highest number of planned data center projects<\/a> in the country after Virginia<\/a>, and across multiple races, data centers have emerged as a key wedge issue. Democratic and Republican candidates are all trying to look tough on data centers but emphasize different messages in their plans. For example, in the Senate race, Democratic candidate and State Rep. James Talarico includes references to environmental impact and sharing corporate profit with the public, while Republican candidate and Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton discusses the need to keep Chinese technology out of US data centers. Both, however, want data centers to bear their own energy infrastructure-related costs<\/a> and want to do away with certain tax exemptions<\/a> for them.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n In July, Talarico unveiled his \u201cHold Data Centers Accountable Plan<\/a>,\u201d which would end state sales tax incentives, give communities more of a say in data center development, require a closed-loop water system in new data centers to limit consumption, and create federal standards to protect the energy grid and environment. Talarico has also proposed an \u201cAI Dividend\u201d for Americans that would be funded by a tax on \u201cAI-attributable profits.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n For his part, Paxton\u2019s \u201cTexas First Data Center Plan<\/a>,\u201d unveiled in August, would support Gov. Greg Abbott\u2019s state-level policies, including repealing sales tax exemptions for data centers, requiring them to pay for electricity they use and add to state capacity, and preventing AI data centers from building in rural parts of the state. On the federal level, Paxton says he would co-sponsor an existing bill making it easier for data centers to connect to off-grid power systems, introduce new legislation prohibiting the use of Chinese technology to power US data centers or infrastructure, and hold data center companies criminally liable if the facility \u201cempowers AI chatbots that undermine children\u2019s safety.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Talarico has also proposed an \u201cAI Dividend\u201d for Americans that would be funded by a tax on \u201cAI-attributable profits\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n In the race for the governor\u2019s office, Democratic challenger and State Rep. Gina Hinojosa has accused<\/a> Abbott, the Republican incumbent, of \u201cflip-flopping\u201d on data centers. Abbott\u2019s office put out a press release<\/a> last year celebrating a $40 billion Google investment that would include three new data center campuses, but in August 2026, with campaign season heating up, he announced an audit<\/a> that could slow new facilities connecting to the state energy grid. Hinojosa, who has recently called for a statewide moratorium<\/a> on data center development, pounced on the perceived inconsistency. \u201cGreg Abbott has zero credibility here. Nobody believes that the arsonist is about to put out the fire,\u201d she said in a social media video.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n The outcome of these races remains highly uncertain. Cook Political Report changed its rating for the governor\u2019s race earlier this month from a likely Republican win to one that leans Republican. It says the open field for the Senate race is a toss-up.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n In Florida, there\u2019s a clash over whether large-scale data centers can be reined in with the right policies or if they should be outright barred in the state. Democratic candidate and former congressman David Jolly has pledged to install a one-year ban on hyperscale data centers on his first day in office, and hasn\u2019t ruled out a permanent extension<\/a>. In one ad<\/a>, Jolly puts data centers in the same breath as crime in a list of things he doesn\u2019t want in Florida.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n His Republican opponent, Congressman Byron Donalds, has previously supported data center development in the state and said Florida is \u201cwide open\u201d<\/a> to build without destroying the state\u2019s beauty. He\u2019s more recently changed his tune though, and while he still doesn\u2019t want to outright ban data centers, he\u2019s tried to assure voters that he\u2019d support policies protecting them from associated risks like higher energy costs. In July, Donalds introduced the Protecting Ratepayers Act<\/a>, which would require data center developers to fund the energy and water needed to run their operations. He\u2019s also supported a state law<\/a> with some similar requirements and environmental guardrails. \u201cIn my Florida, if you don\u2019t protect our pocketbooks and our people, you won\u2019t build data centers, period,\u201d he assures voters<\/a> in one ad. Energy experts have warned, however, that Donalds\u2019 pledge to lean on nuclear and natural gas could actually raise costs for consumers<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Despite these efforts, he\u2019s been branded as \u201cData Center Donalds<\/a>\u201d by opponents, and polling suggests he may have to fight for conservative voters who also strongly oppose data center development<\/a>. An October NBC6\/Telemundo Station Group poll<\/a> found that 45 percent of likely voter respondents opposed data centers in Florida, with 38 percent in support and 17 percent undecided. A higher percentage opposed data centers in their own communities, at 59 percent. Still, the poll found Donalds has a lead of 48 percent to Jolly\u2019s 41 percent, with a margin of error of plus or minus 4 percent. Ten percent of respondents were still undecided.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n In one of the country\u2019s relatively few purple states, both candidates for governor have accused each other of changing their rhetoric<\/a> on data centers just to get votes. Democratic Gov. Josh Shapiro and Republican challenger and state Treasurer Stacy Garrity each appear to have hardened their stances amid the widespread backlash to data center development, even though they previously touted opportunity in such projects.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Shapiro proudly announced a $20 billion investment<\/a> from Amazon last year that would bring new data centers to the state, and credited Pennsylvania\u2019s new fast track permitting program in helping lure the investment. But this year, Shapiro has tempered his enthusiasm, signing an executive order<\/a> in August prohibiting nondisclosure agreements for data center developers and taking AI data center proposals off of the fast track. Shapiro has said<\/a> his views evolved based on community feedback.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n But Garrity, too, has seemed to turn against data centers as the election has drawn closer. In a radio interview last year<\/a>, she said rural parts of the state would be \u201cperfect places to put data centers,\u201d and they\u2019d be largely welcomed based on the economic opportunity they\u2019d bring. She also praised the Amazon investment<\/a> Shapiro secured at the time, though it\u2019s now a target of some of her attack ads<\/a>. This year, she has said data center developers must engage the community rather than \u201cjam it down their throats,\u201d and she supports a pause on development lasting no more than three years, according to Spotlight PA<\/em><\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n An early October Quinnipiac University poll<\/a> of likely Pennsylvania voters found 64 percent believed AI data centers in the state would do more harm than good, with a plus or minus 3.9 percent margin of error. But a far larger portion of Democratic respondents were wary of them, with 80 percent saying they\u2019d do more harm than good. That suggests it may be even more essential for Shapiro to shore up his position for his base, though the poll had him leading 59 percent to Garrity\u2019s 34 percent.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n In the battle for Ohio\u2019s Senate seat, data centers are both \u201cthe new ingredient (and the new problem),\u201d according to a leaked National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) memo<\/a>. Republican incumbent Jon Husted and Democratic candidate Sherrod Brown, who\u2019s fighting to win back his former seat, \u201care in a dead heat,\u201d the NRSC warned in August. And data centers, the group added, \u201care the anchor hanging around Husted\u2019s neck.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n As the NRSC identified, Brown has made his opposition to data centers a central tenet of his campaign, labeling Husted \u201cthe face of data centers\u201d in the state. Brown has hammered Husted over his past support for data centers as lieutenant governor, where he helped install tax breaks<\/a>. Husted has said he believes local communities should be able to decide whether to bring in data centers, and that some may find the revenue useful.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n \u201cIf he loses and data centers get the blame, politicians across the country will take notice\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n At least as of August, the NRSC still believed voters favored that approach over sweeping bans but acknowledged that current perception is negative. The group warned that losing the Ohio Senate seat could endanger future support for data centers. \u201cIf he loses and data centers get the blame, politicians across the country will take notice \u2014 and they will not go near the next one,\u201d the memo says.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Husted introduced the Ratepayer Protection Act<\/a>, which would require large load customers like data centers to cover their own energy costs and the infrastructure upgrades needed to accommodate them. The bill passed the House and was seen as a potential life raft<\/a> for Husted, but narrowly failed to pass the Senate<\/a>, even with a handful of Democrats voting in favor. The Cook Political Report rates the race as a toss-up, and a RealClear Polling average<\/a> of recent surveys shows Brown with a slight edge.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Data centers are a hot topic across two key races in Michigan with razor-thin margins. The state is handling dozens of new data center proposals<\/a>, and both candidates for Michigan\u2019s open Senate seat support a moratorium. Republican former Rep. Mike Rogers supports a one-year pause but opposes a federal ban, while Democratic candidate and former public health official Abdul El-Sayed says there should be<\/a> \u201cno more data centers until we can do it safely and with federal protections.\u201d Rogers\u2019 moratorium support came days after<\/a> The Lever<\/em> reported on his investments<\/a> that reportedly stand to gain from the buildout.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n El-Sayed put his stake in the ground on data centers relatively early, compared to other Democrats across the country. In February, Politico<\/em> wrote that \u201cunderdogs\u201d<\/a> like El-Sayed were centering data centers in their primary campaigns, raising what\u2019s now a common topic in campaign ads. El-Sayed is also now locked in what the Cook Political Report rates as a dead heat<\/a> with Rogers, in a race that could determine the balance of power in Congress. Rogers and El-Sayed are competing for a seat currently held by Democrat Gary Peters, who isn\u2019t seeking another term.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n In another toss-up race, Democratic organizer William Lawrence is challenging Republican incumbent Tom Barrett for his House seat. Lawrence called for a year-long federal moratorium on new data center construction during his primary campaign, and when he won the nomination, his supporters reportedly chanted<\/a>, \u201cdata centers lost.\u201d In the general election, data centers have continued to be a central theme. Barrett introduced two bills<\/a> this summer that would strengthen local decision-making on data center development and bar federal lawmakers from signing non-disclosure agreements about data centers. Lawrence\u2019s data center plan includes environmental standards, worker protections, and \u201czoning buffers\u201d for data center development.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Wisconsin is another state where both gubernatorial candidates have backed away from previous support for data centers, but neither has gone as far as to call for a moratorium. Democratic nominee and Milwaukee County Executive David Crowley, for example, set himself apart<\/a> from his progressive primary opponent Francesca Hong by declining to oppose a development moratorium that she supported.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Rep. Tom Tiffany, the Republican nominee, similarly opposes a moratorium in favor of data center guardrails, and voted for a bill<\/a> allowing faster permitting for data center projects. But Tiffany has still tried to label his opponent as \u201cdata center David Crowley<\/a>,\u201d pointing to past comments he made saying the state shouldn\u2019t \u201cautomatically roll back all data center tax incentives.\u201d More recently, Crowley has said<\/a> he would sign a bill repealing tax subsidies for the facilities. Cook Political Report says the race is a dead heat<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Nevada\u2019s Democratic Party created an entire website branding Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo \u201cdata center Joe<\/a>,\u201d highlighting his past supportive comments about data centers and money his campaign took<\/a> from AI-connected donors. Lombardo, locked in a tight race to keep his seat, has fought the accusations. He introduced an executive order<\/a> last month that ties tax incentives to developers covering power costs and meeting water use standards, empowering the state to claw back money from those who violate it. But Democratic challenger and attorney general Aaron Ford has said he\u2019d go further, pausing tax breaks entirely<\/a> for new data centers.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n At the same time, Ford has been criticized for championing a 2015 bill enshrining data center tax breaks. Ford said<\/a> his thinking has evolved with new information, and that \u201cthe data centers of 11 years ago are not the data centers of 2026.\u201d The issue is particularly salient in a state that\u2019s experiencing significant water issues<\/a>. The Cook Political Report says the race is a toss-up.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Swing state Georgia has been called<\/a> \u201cone of the nation\u2019s most attractive markets for AI, hyperscale cloud and enterprise data center development,\u201d and its gubernatorial candidates \u2014 Democratic nominee and former Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms and Republican nominee and healthcare executive Rick Jackson \u2014 have sparred over each other\u2019s data center records. Bottoms supports a pause<\/a> on development to evaluate environmental and cost effects, while Jackson says it should be up to local communities to decide whether to bring a data center in.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n At a recent debate<\/a> in the toss-up race, Bottoms said her opponent \u201ccannot be trusted\u201d on the topic based on his investment in a Texas data center. Jackson shot back that Bottoms approved and gave tax breaks to multiple data centers as mayor, which Bottoms denied, saying she only approved one non-hyperscale data center that wasn\u2019t near a residential community. While Bottoms led the Invest Atlanta board in 2018, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution<\/em> reported<\/a>, the group approved up to $440 million in bonds for a mixed-use project at Georgia Tech that included a data center. This was not a \u201cdirect financing mechanism\u201d but did help the project get tax abatement, the AJC<\/em> wrote, and its data center was far smaller than those mainly at issue today.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n In dry Arizona where concerns about water are a top issue for many voters, the most interesting conflict is within parties, not across them. Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs and Attorney General Kris Mayes are both locked in close races with their respective Republican challengers, Rep. Andy Biggs and state legislator Warren Petersen. But the two Democrats are split over<\/a> how to regulate data centers: Mayes supports a statewide pause on development, while Hobbs opposes one.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n In dry Arizona, the most interesting conflict is within parties, not across them<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n Mayes says the state should \u201ctake a beat\u201d to evaluate water and energy needs, a move Petersen has criticized in a rare outright defense of data centers, saying<\/a>, \u201cIf you like your tech and your phone and your computer and the stuff you can use that for, you probably think data centers are important.\u201d Hobbs, meanwhile, says data centers are here to stay, and the state should instead figure out how to best make them work for communities. That puts her significantly closer<\/a> to her Republican opponent, who similarly opposes a moratorium.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Iowa\u2019s open governor\u2019s seat is another close race where data centers are taking center stage. The state economic development authority says<\/a> Iowa\u2019s wind energy and low construction and business costs have attracted developers there, but their growth has also brought concerns to local communities.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Democratic nominee and state auditor Rob Sand has not supported a blanket moratorium but says he would end tax breaks for data centers, make them cover their own costs, and keep NDAs from shielding deals from communities. Republican nominee and businessman Zach Lahn called for a moratorium<\/a> on new development and eliminating tax incentives for them.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\nTexas gubernatorial and Senate races<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Florida gubernatorial race<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Pennsylvania gubernatorial race<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Wisconsin gubernatorial race<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Nevada gubernatorial race<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Georgia gubernatorial race<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Arizona gubernatorial and AG races<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\n